<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Saving Time and Money with SaaS for EDA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/</link>
	<description>From an EDA marketing insider</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:17:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 05:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Some SaaS talk at DAC:
http://theasicguy.com/2009/08/16/dac-theme-3-increasing-clouds-over-sf-bay/
http://www.registerbits.com/dac-eda-times-a-changin
http://www.xuropa.com/blog/2009/07/23/xuropa-at-design-automation-conference/
http://www.meetup.com/SaaS-Electronic-Design-Meetup-Group/boards/thread/7191698/


Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Some SaaS talk at DAC:<br />
<a href="http://theasicguy.com/2009/08/16/dac-theme-3-increasing-clouds-over-sf-bay/" rel="nofollow">http://theasicguy.com/2009/08/16/dac-theme-3-increasing-clouds-over-sf-bay/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.registerbits.com/dac-eda-times-a-changin" rel="nofollow">http://www.registerbits.com/dac-eda-times-a-changin</a><br />
<a href="http://www.xuropa.com/blog/2009/07/23/xuropa-at-design-automation-conference/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xuropa.com/blog/2009/07/23/xuropa-at-design-automation-conference/</a><br />
<a href="http://www.meetup.com/SaaS-Electronic-Design-Meetup-Group/boards/thread/7191698/" rel="nofollow">http://www.meetup.com/SaaS-Electronic-Design-Meetup-Group/boards/thread/7191698/</a></p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-536</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-536</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

I didn&#039;t make DAC this year.  Was there much talk of SaaS for EDA at the conference?  If so what was the prevailing opinion?

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t make DAC this year.  Was there much talk of SaaS for EDA at the conference?  If so what was the prevailing opinion?</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-535</guid>
		<description>Chris,

The smaller EDA companies publish clear pricing in their news releases and at their web sites (Altium, Tanner EDA, OrCAD, etc.), while the larger companies take an overly defensive position and cloak their pricing.

Pricing transparency is a virtue.

Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>The smaller EDA companies publish clear pricing in their news releases and at their web sites (Altium, Tanner EDA, OrCAD, etc.), while the larger companies take an overly defensive position and cloak their pricing.</p>
<p>Pricing transparency is a virtue.</p>
<p>Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-534</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-534</guid>
		<description>I agree.  To build significant momentum around SaaS for EDA I think there needs to be open dialog around the economic model &amp; pricing for different types of workload profiles.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree.  To build significant momentum around SaaS for EDA I think there needs to be open dialog around the economic model &amp; pricing for different types of workload profiles.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Chris,
The only way to get a quote is from a Cadence account manager, or some anonymous Cadence user. For reasons of paranoia and security the folks at Cadence keep all pricing secret instead of just publishing it - I think that&#039;s a marketing mistake.
Daniel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
The only way to get a quote is from a Cadence account manager, or some anonymous Cadence user. For reasons of paranoia and security the folks at Cadence keep all pricing secret instead of just publishing it &#8211; I think that&#8217;s a marketing mistake.<br />
Daniel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 01:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

I want to follow up on David&#039;s comment re. the business model.  Can you share some details of the basic cost structure of CDS&#039; hosted solutions offerings?  For instance do they have a $/CPU-hr approach for a customer that might want to offload DRC, LVS &amp; OPC jobs to them or are they looking to roll services into every deal?  For potential customers with existing licenses &amp; compute infrastructure to be compelled by this I think there needs to be a easily understandable cost structure that will make the value propoition compelling to both engineering &amp; finance.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>I want to follow up on David&#8217;s comment re. the business model.  Can you share some details of the basic cost structure of CDS&#8217; hosted solutions offerings?  For instance do they have a $/CPU-hr approach for a customer that might want to offload DRC, LVS &amp; OPC jobs to them or are they looking to roll services into every deal?  For potential customers with existing licenses &amp; compute infrastructure to be compelled by this I think there needs to be a easily understandable cost structure that will make the value propoition compelling to both engineering &amp; finance.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Payne</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Payne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Scott, I agree that CDN is showing reduced revenue plans for 2009 compared to 2008, Magma is even more tenuous, Mentor seems to be treading water, and SNPS is the strongest financially. The only way for SaaS to work for the EDA companies is if the deals are all incremental, and would not have happened with the old pricing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott, I agree that CDN is showing reduced revenue plans for 2009 compared to 2008, Magma is even more tenuous, Mentor seems to be treading water, and SNPS is the strongest financially. The only way for SaaS to work for the EDA companies is if the deals are all incremental, and would not have happened with the old pricing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bloom</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Bloom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Hasnt this been tried before by both MGC and SNPS?  

MGC had the DesignWide group, Synopsys had the distributed software flow.  THere was a startup that crashed and burned out of portland based on this as well.. (blanking on the name)

With all the money woes of the CEOs at the big three, where they talk about getting more out of the IC design flow, why in reality do we think they will truely start a cheaper way to get the same results?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hasnt this been tried before by both MGC and SNPS?  </p>
<p>MGC had the DesignWide group, Synopsys had the distributed software flow.  THere was a startup that crashed and burned out of portland based on this as well.. (blanking on the name)</p>
<p>With all the money woes of the CEOs at the big three, where they talk about getting more out of the IC design flow, why in reality do we think they will truely start a cheaper way to get the same results?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-354</guid>
		<description>David,
EDA SaaS customers pay less annually for tools, and people (CAD group, IT department, integration, scripting). In the old days at Intel I was a circuit designer, however I used to spend days at a time writing my own scripts to improve the design automation of my group because our internal CAD group was too busy with their own projects to help me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,<br />
EDA SaaS customers pay less annually for tools, and people (CAD group, IT department, integration, scripting). In the old days at Intel I was a circuit designer, however I used to spend days at a time writing my own scripts to improve the design automation of my group because our internal CAD group was too busy with their own projects to help me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/2009/06/15/saving-time-and-money-with-saas-for-eda/comment-page-1/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/payne/?p=109#comment-353</guid>
		<description>Daniel - This is a very interesting model for engineering markets. What interests me is how the business model works in reality? How is the 50% saving achieved and how can existing users calculate that they will achieve those savings before they agree to switch over?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel &#8211; This is a very interesting model for engineering markets. What interests me is how the business model works in reality? How is the 50% saving achieved and how can existing users calculate that they will achieve those savings before they agree to switch over?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

