<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do designers share a common ESL design ideology?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipdesignmag.com/martins/2008/04/03/do-designers-share-a-common-esl-design-ideology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/martins/2008/04/03/do-designers-share-a-common-esl-design-ideology/</link>
	<description>ESL, embedded processors, and more</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taken for Granted &#187; The debate over the definition of ESL continues</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/martins/2008/04/03/do-designers-share-a-common-esl-design-ideology/comment-page-1/#comment-10636</link>
		<dc:creator>Taken for Granted &#187; The debate over the definition of ESL continues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:58:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/martins/?p=3#comment-10636</guid>
		<description>[...] as complementing the current &#8220;RTL Design Ideology&#8221;  (see what I wrote in April:  &#8220;Do designers share a common ESL design ideology?&#8221;).   But it may take a while longer for this to emerge.   When it does, some of the ESL-ish [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as complementing the current &#8220;RTL Design Ideology&#8221;  (see what I wrote in April:  &#8220;Do designers share a common ESL design ideology?&#8221;).   But it may take a while longer for this to emerge.   When it does, some of the ESL-ish [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

