<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: About</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chipdesignmag.com/bailey/about/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/bailey</link>
	<description>ESL Design and Verification</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 02:23:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conventional Wisdom and the &#8220;Intelligent Test Bench&#8221; &#171; No one is invincible!</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/bailey/about/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Conventional Wisdom and the &#8220;Intelligent Test Bench&#8221; &#171; No one is invincible!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/bailey/?page_id=2#comment-210</guid>
		<description>[...] Brian Bailey has writen a compatible definition of an intelligent test bench in the following quote: An intelligent testbench can either replace or enhance existing simulation based or formal verification methodologies. Constrained random generation techniques manage to create huge quantities of stimulus, but at the end of the day they have difficulties both with closure (achieving the desired verification goals) and secondly with efficiency (huge server farms required). An intelligent testbench can help either by determining efficient stimulus sets or by finding ways to reach difficult to reach coverage points. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brian Bailey has writen a compatible definition of an intelligent test bench in the following quote: An intelligent testbench can either replace or enhance existing simulation based or formal verification methodologies. Constrained random generation techniques manage to create huge quantities of stimulus, but at the end of the day they have difficulties both with closure (achieving the desired verification goals) and secondly with efficiency (huge server farms required). An intelligent testbench can help either by determining efficient stimulus sets or by finding ways to reach difficult to reach coverage points. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKMurphy &#187; Non-Customers Are Where Important Changes Often Start</title>
		<link>http://www.chipdesignmag.com/bailey/about/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>SKMurphy &#187; Non-Customers Are Where Important Changes Often Start</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 06:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chipdesignmag.com/bailey/?page_id=2#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] was reminded of the value of talking to non-customers by a September 16 blog post by Brian Bailey entitled &#8220;Bye Bye Cadence.&#8221; Recent events may have rendered the title unintentionally [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was reminded of the value of talking to non-customers by a September 16 blog post by Brian Bailey entitled &#8220;Bye Bye Cadence.&#8221; Recent events may have rendered the title unintentionally [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

